Critical Analysis of Quantitative Research Essay Example for Free

Critical Analysis of Quantitative Research Essay The researchers in this experiment aimed to â€Å"Investigate the quantitative differentiation of pulmonary dendritic cells in smoker with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) to explore the possible role of dendritic cells in smokers suffering COPD† (Yan-wei, Yong-jiang, Xian-sheng, 2010). Dendritic cells (DCs) are inflammatory cells that are considered to be the promoter of immune responses; knowing this the researchers hypothesized that DCs may play an important role in the development of the disease. See more: how to write an analysis Subjects were broken into three groups based on an illness gradient: (control group, smokers without airflow obstruction, and COPD group as determined by the Chinese Society of Respiratory Disease). Samples of alveolar tissue were taken from these three groups and studied using immunohistochemical staining and immunofluorescence confocal laser scanning. The results from the experiment are portrayed using a one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s r coefficient, graphs, and scatter plots. The conclusion of the data showed that â€Å"The quantity of the DCs significantly increased in smokers with COPD compared with non-smokers or smokers without COPD† (Yan-wei et al., 2010). A critical analysis of this article received a 31.5. The article was well put together and provided many up to date references as resources to give a better understanding of the research. The authors explained their methodologies in great detail and the production of their data was concise and easy to read. However, the study lacked when it came to representing a diverse population. The study also lacks in terms of providing evidence of the consent of the subjects and the evidence of the governing body of the experiment. The research that was done in this experiment allowed scientist to develop new hypotheses concerning dendritic cells and their role in chronic diseases such as COPD. The links that were made with this research between dendritic cells, lung capacity, and cigarette smoke could potentially be the forefront of new treatments and earlier diagnoses for COPD victims. References Yan-wei, S., Yong-jian, X., Xian-sheng, L. (2010). Quantitative differentiation of dendritic cells in lung tissues of smokers with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chinese Medical Journal, 123(12). Retreived from http://www.cmj.org/Periodical/PDF/200481469383420.pdf

College Binge Drinking: Not All Just Fun and Games Essay -- Essays Pap

College Binge Drinking: Not All Just Fun and Games For those who go out and drink in college, it is all about the good times, right? What everyone does not think about is the potential danger that drinking can cause, especially to the astonishing amount of college students who drink heavily on a regular basis. Alcohol abuse is the leading cause of death among teens and young adults, and according to many professionals, the high rate of binge-drinking and its effects on college students and the school or university is the top social issue on campuses. Despite all the attention given to this issue, especially in the past few years, no noticeable improvement has been seen. Drinking has even been called a â€Å"college pastime;† however, there is often a high price to pay for those who claim that they just want to have a good time, especially when it comes to the drinking that goes on at college campuses. Many first-time college goers need to realize that certain people have a higher tendency to drink heavily, and it is prove n that there is high risk for both those who do participate in this dangerous activity and for their non-drinking peers. It is a proven fact that young adults are among the heaviest drinkers in the United States, and college students tend to drink more than their non-college attending peers. These statistics don’t make all that much sense considering most people would say that they go to college to get ahead; however, if you use college as an excuse to go out and get drunk all the time (which many seem to do), then you might be worse off than those who do not go to college at all. Laura G. Hensley, a writer for the Journal of College Counseling, reports that â€Å"Binge drinking [also known as heavy episodic dr... ...k Groups.† American Journal of Public Health 93.11 (Nov 2003): 1929-1934. Academic Search Premier EBSCO. Roesch Library, Dayton. 26 March 2004. . Weitzman, Elissa R. â€Å"Social Developmental Overview of Heavy Episodic or Binge Drinking Among U.S. College Students.† Psychiatric Times 21.2 (Feb 2004): 57-60. Academic Search Premier EBSCO. Roesch Library, Dayton. 26 March 2004. . Williams, David, Adrian Thomas, Walter C. Buboltz Jr., and Maibel McKinney. â€Å"Changing the Attitudes that Predict Underage Drinking in College Students: A Program Evaluation.† Journal of College Counseling 5.1 (Spring 2002): 39-49. Academic Search Premier EBSCO. Roesch Library, Dayton. 27 March 2004. .

Discuss Nationalism in the ERa of Good Feelings Essay

Nationalism, not sectionalism, was the driving force during the era of good feelings. Nationalism became the leading ideology of the American republic. While sectionalism proceeded in bringing the nation into turmoil and constant bickering among the politicians, as in the case with dealings leading to the Missouri compromise, nationalism was able to unite the nation into a headstrong body, led by an ever-increasing, more powerful central government. Nationalism, many can argue, was a guiding light that helped the populous in Europe unite. As early as the late great Roman Empire, it was that notion of being a part of a uniform body of civil, governed people who helped these places flourish. In early 19th century America, during the â€Å"Era of Good Feelings† as one newspaper put it, Americans began to root themselves in all that the nation stood for which helped them in turn begin to think about moving the United States into a respectable position among the world’s super powers. For example, Stephen Decatur toasts the country and acknowledges that it is our country, for better or for worse. This is a sharp contrast to the views of our founding fathers because George Washington himself, the â€Å"father of our nation†, saluted king George although he was a part of the attempt to establish a separate nation. Poets and writers also began to capture the nation’s spirit. In her Address to the New York State Legislature, Emma Hart Willard, explains how America has no problem in setting precedents and taking risks for the benefit of the country. For example, did the country take a risk in having a democracy instead of a monarchy? The answer to this question is yes, because no one in the history of the world before America, was able to successfully run a government the way that new nation ran. Although they had to switch from the Articles of Confederation to the Constitution, this just proved that the nation could adapt with its people, thus setting precedents. Sectionalism only succeeded in dividing the country. This is because sectionalists always had their own agendas, which often clashed with that of their opposition. The division of votes on the tariff of 1816 was a pretty noticeable one, although the final vote was not really affected by  non-tariff votes. Sectionalism can be found here in the numbers of each region. The majority of New England Votes were cast against the tariff. This should be of no surprise because New England, which at the time was largely federalist, was against the whole war of 1812 effort from the get go. If it were not for the nationalistic pride of the western and southern regions, this protective tariff would have not been passed. Nationalism creates an atmosphere which attempts to propel the nation forward instead of becoming entangled in issues which cause a separation of agendas, thought, and eventually causes a rift in peoples beliefs. The nationalism brought about by the Era of Good feelings helped the United States get on track to becoming what it is today. If you look at current events, you can see that the United States operates with more fluidity when we have a common enemy instead of creating enemies out of our brethren because of our ideals.

How Long Do Supreme Court Justices Serve

The U.S. Constitution states that once confirmed by the Senate, a justice serves for life. He or she is not elected and does not need to run for office, although they may retire if they wish. This means that Supreme Court justices can serve through multiple presidential terms. That was intended to at least partly insulate the justices so they need not take politics into account when making Constitutional decisions that will affect the entire U.S. population for decades or even centuries. Fast Facts: How Long Do Supreme Court Justices Serve? After being seated on the Supreme Court bench, justices may serve for life or retire as they wish.They may be impeached for improper behavior, but only two have been impeached and only one of those was removed from office.The average length on the court is 16 years; 49 justices died in office, 56 retired. How Long Do They Serve? Since Justices are able to stay as long as they choose on the Supreme Court bench, there are no term limits. Of the 114 justices who have sat on the bench since the Supreme Court was established in 1789, 49 died in office; the last to do so was Antonin Scalia in 2016. Fifty-six retired, the latest being Anthony Kennedy in 2018. The average length of stay is about 16 years. Supreme Court Justices can be impeached and removed from the court if they do not maintain â€Å"good behavior.† Only two Supreme Court Justices have ever been impeached. John Pickering (served 1795–1804) was charged with mental instability and intoxication on the bench and was impeached and removed from office on March 12, 1804. Samuel Chase (1796–1811) was impeached on March 12, 1804—the same day Pickering was removed—for what the Congress considered seditious remarks and improper behavior in and out of court. Chase was acquitted and stayed in office until his death on June 19, 1811.   Current Supreme Court Figures As of 2019, the Supreme Court is made up of the following individuals; the date included is the day each took his or her seat. Chief Justice: John G. Roberts, Jr., September 29, 2005 Associate Justices: Clarence Thomas, October 23, 1991Ruth Bader Ginsburg, August 10, 1993Stephen G. Breyer, August 3, 1994Samuel A. Alito, Jr., January 31, 2006Sonia Sotomayor, August 8, 2009Elena Kagan, August 7, 2010Neil M. Gorsuch, April 10, 2017Brett M. Kavanaugh, Oct 6, 2018 Legal Make-Up of the Supreme Court According to SupremeCourt.gov, The Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of the United States and such number of Associate Justices as may be fixed by Congress. The number of Associate Justices is currently fixed at eight. Power to nominate the Justices is vested in the President of the United States, and appointments are made with the advice and consent of the Senate. Article III,  §1 of the Constitution further provides that [t]he Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office. The number of associate justices on the court over the years has varied from five to nine. The most current number, eight, was established in 1869. Fun Facts About Supreme Court Justices Supreme Court Justices have an extraordinarily important role to play in interpreting the U.S. Constitution. It has only been recently, however, that Justices have included women, non-Christians, or non-whites. Here are some fast, fun facts about Americas Supreme Court Justices over the years. Total number of Justices: 114Average length of tenure: 16 yearsLongest-serving Chief Justice: John Marshall (more than 34 years)Shortest serving Chief Justice: John Rutledge (just 5 months and 14 days under a temporary commission)Longest-serving Associate Justice: William O. Douglas (almost 37 years)Shortest serving Associate Justice: John Rutledge (1 year and 18 days)Youngest Chief Justice when appointed: John Jay (44 years old)Oldest Chief Justice when appointed: Harlan F. Stone (68 years old)Youngest Associate Justice when appointed: Joseph Story (32 years old)Oldest Associate Justice when appointed: Horace Lurton (65 years old)Oldest person to serve on the Supreme Court: Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr (90 years old on retirement)Only person to serve as both Chief Justice and U.S. president: William Howard TaftFirst Jewish Supreme Court Justice: Louis D. Brandeis (served 1916–1939)First African American Supreme Court Justice: Thurgood Marshall (1967–1991)First Hispanic Su preme Court Justice: Sonia Sotomayor (2009–Present)First female Supreme Court Justice: Sandra Day OConnor (1981–2006)Most recent foreign-born Justice: Felix Frankfurter, born in Vienna, Austria (1939–1962) Sources Current Members. Supreme Court of the United States. SupremeCourt.govMcCloskey, Robert G., and Sanford Levinson. The American Supreme Court, Sixth Edition. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2016.More than 2 centuries of Supreme Court justices, in 18 numbers. Nation: Public Broadcasting System News Hour, July 9, 2018.  Ã‚  Samuel Chase Impeached. Federal Judicial Center.gov.  Schwartz, Bernard. A History of the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Warren, Charles. The Supreme Court in United States History, three volumes. 1923 (published by Cosimo Classics 2011).